RHEL ES 3 Kernel Upgrade Issue
cap at nsc.liu.se
Wed Apr 14 02:11:41 CDT 2010
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Murphy, Brian S CTR USAF AFSPC 83 NOS/Det 4 wrote:
> Ah - http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/updates/i386/RPMS/ has
> both dated 4 Nov 2009 - looks good.
> Is there some way to know how that translates to kernel.org versions (or
> are they patches to 2.4.21 put out to fix CVE issues)?
Vendor versions like RHEL/CentOS/SLES/whatever can't really be translated to
kernel.org versions. From a base-line perspective 2.4.21-63.EL may be near
2.4.21.x but some parts are backported from much higher versions. From a
security perspective you either read the RHSA (RedHat Security Announcements)
and/or the rpm changelog (rpm -qp --changelog kernel...rpm).
> Or how other CentOS RPMs there translate to "vendor versions" (BIND shows
> 9.2.4-25, but ISC's named versions are at 9.4.x and 9.6.x, etc.)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/attachments/20100414/60ce6ea3/attachment.sig
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge