IT Assistant & IPv6
jgarzik at redhat.com
Tue Sep 29 14:04:48 CDT 2009
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:03:24AM -0700, John Oliver wrote:
> I had to enable IPv6 on my servers. Now, IT Assistant is directing me
> to set a Java parameter that will, apparently, force Java to prefer IPv6
> over IPv4 Unacceptable... there is no good reason for this. And given
> IT Assistant's track record of weird issues, I wouldn't be surprised if
> it doesn't work properly over IPv6
> It's going to be a long time before IPv6 is widely deployed enough to be
> preferred over IPv4 I cannot have every Java application that needs to
> connect to something over the network be forced to use IPv6 simply to
> make IT Assistant happy. This is guaranteed to cause timeouts and all
> sorts of weird issues.
This is standard behavior, to prefer IPv6 -- if present -- over IPv4.
Otherwise, quite logically, the transition would never by noticed by
clients, even if every site supports both IPv4 and IPv6.
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge