RHEL3 and SAS5/iR: very bad performance
rostetter at mail.utexas.edu
Wed Jan 24 10:48:15 CST 2007
Quoting John Hodrien <johnh at comp.leeds.ac.uk>:
> Should the RAID1 performance be much worse?
No more than 50% worse, in the worst case.
> With large files shouldn't you
> be disk throughput (not interface) limited, and so in the best case have
> identical performance?
Depends on lots of factors.
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge