PERC3/Di failure workaround hypothesis

Mark Watts m.watts at eris.qinetiq.com
Wed May 26 03:26:00 CDT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> I have to say, I find this both distressing and encouraging.
>
> Distressing because we about to deploy a PE2650 with PERC3/Di, RAID1,
> RHAS.
> Encouraging because clearly the issue is being actively looked at.
>
> So, with the above setup, should I *expect* to get problems ?
> Does the issue happen to most similar server or just a small but
> significant few ?

I've been running several 2650's for long periods of time (with the 3/Di) and 
haven't seen a problem. None of these servers are insanely loaded though, so 
if its a loading issue, you might not see it unless you're hammering 
seven-shades out of the box.

Mark.

- -- 
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ Trusted Information Management
Trusted Solutions and Services group
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAtFMoBn4EFUVUIO0RAn5wAJ4hx0m17dRu8GFp33xdV9PXjMpGHQCg3ifz
IJUc297NX/wt+rBvnZA9xOA=
=nQix
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Linux-PowerEdge mailing list