PERC3/Di failure workaround hypothesis
m.watts at eris.qinetiq.com
Wed May 26 03:26:00 CDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> I have to say, I find this both distressing and encouraging.
> Distressing because we about to deploy a PE2650 with PERC3/Di, RAID1,
> Encouraging because clearly the issue is being actively looked at.
> So, with the above setup, should I *expect* to get problems ?
> Does the issue happen to most similar server or just a small but
> significant few ?
I've been running several 2650's for long periods of time (with the 3/Di) and
haven't seen a problem. None of these servers are insanely loaded though, so
if its a loading issue, you might not see it unless you're hammering
seven-shades out of the box.
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ Trusted Information Management
Trusted Solutions and Services group
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge