Duplex Questions

Anthony Porcano aporcano at kaplan.com
Sun Dec 8 10:43:00 CST 2002

Hi Phil, Thanks for responding.

I am running the 2.4.18-10smp kernel, and version 4.3.2 of the e1000

Our switch is hard set to 100 full, which I have been told might be the
cause of the adapter being brought up at 100 half. This should be easy
enough to fix with an entry to modules.conf forcing the adapter to be
brought up at 100 full, but if this is the case then does that mean that
procfg is just giving out incorrect information when it queries the
duplex state? 

Thanks Much,

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-poweredge-admin at dell.com
[mailto:linux-poweredge-admin at dell.com] On Behalf Of phr at doc.ic.ac.uk
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:12 PM
To: linux-poweredge at dell.com
Subject: Re: Duplex Questions
Importance: Low

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Anthony Porcano wrote:

>>One of the first things I noticed in setting up the servers was the
>>advent of the procfg utility and the procfgd daemon process. However
>>this is where the confusion comes in.
>>Dmesg is reporting that my interfaces are being brought up at half
>>duplex; however, the adapters listing of procfg lists both at full
What does /proc/net/PRO_LAN_Adapters say? Which kernel version are you
using? Intel's website claims to require version 4.2 or higher of the
e1000 driver. Redhat 7.3 didn't ship with this, but recent errata
kernels have it.

$ uname -a
Linux prawn 2.4.18-3 #1 Thu Apr 18 07:37:53 EDT 2002 i686 unknown
$ cat /proc/net/PRO_LAN_Adapters/eth0/Driver_Version

$ uname -a
Linux polaris 2.4.18-17.7.x #1 Tue Oct 8 13:33:14 EDT 2002 i686 unknown
$ cat /proc/net/PRO_LAN_Adapters/eth0/Driver_Version
4.3.2-k1 NAPI (020618)



Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
Linux-PowerEdge at dell.com
Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq or search the list
at http://lists.us.dell.com/htdig/

More information about the Linux-PowerEdge mailing list