Advice for a debian server

Johan Sjöberg johan.sjoberg at
Tue Sep 7 06:18:22 CDT 2010

Well, that's a nice flamebait if I ever saw one...

These "enterprise" distros are generally very bloated. Who wants Bluetooth support and a desktop environment on a server? You need to do a lot af deselecting when installing RHEL/CentOS to get a reasonably slim installation. And you are also "forced" to use LVM, which is quite unneccesary when you use hardware RAID.

Debian is really lightweight and reliable (yes it is). But Ubuntu is too edgy to be used in production, I would rather run Debian testing.

The fact a product is commercial doesn't make it more reliable. Sure, it's nice to have commercial support, if you need it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not like RedHat codes all their packages themselves. The "hobby developer's" code goes into RHEL as well.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-poweredge-bounces at [mailto:linux-poweredge-
> bounces at] On Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens
> Sent: den 7 september 2010 12:44
> To: linux-poweredge at
> Subject: RE: Advice for a debian server
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Tim Connors <tim.w.connors at>
> wrote:
> >
> > But if you know what you're doing, often debian is better.  Depends on
> > your needs and skills.  We run debian fine here, with no difficulty
> > talking to the raid cards and hardware sensors etc that we use, and
> > because debian is a far better quality distribution than redhat (and thus
> > centos), and is a bit more engineered (rather than slapped together with
> > 100mph masking tape) than ubuntu, you might get a lot better mileage out
> > of it.
> FYI:
> RHEL is a commercial enterprise linux distri and debian is a not reliable
> opensource project with hobby developers.
> Best regards,
> Morten
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
> Linux-PowerEdge at
> Please read the FAQ at

More information about the Linux-PowerEdge mailing list