network card bandwidth on a poweredge 1850?
Rich Henning
tonaleclipse at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 20:39:02 CST 2009
Hiya.
On Mar 3, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Brett Dikeman wrote:
> I saturated a single gigabit connection, and switched over to a pair
> of bonded ports. Unfortunately, the throughoutput I'm seeing is
> virtually identical- 980Mbit/sec according to Munin stats (on a single
> port, the limit was 975.) Half a percent seems statistically
> insignificant.
How are the ports bonded at the linux box and the switch? 802.3ad?
multiple default gateways?
The output of the following commands would be helpful:
# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 (if this is the appropriate bonded
device)
# ip addr sho
# ip route sho
> -I should be feeding it plenty; I have 10 simultaneous sessions from a
> collection of machines, several of which can do 40MB/sec on their own.
> A survey of the machines shows none of them working very hard.
Try using iperf to generate TCP traffic. That will make sure you're
generating more than a GigE's worth if you tell it to ;-)
> -The switch is no slouch; a lightly loaded Cisco 4506. Everything is
> on the same blade. Traffic is not crossing any subnets/VLANs.
Ports trunked together at the switch?
Hard to say where things are going wrong without more info.
-R
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge
mailing list