disk i/o latency on 1850 4e/si
Andrew Reid
AndrewReid at eastlink.ca
Thu Apr 16 11:01:16 CDT 2009
Any chance you have an active snapshot of the partition under test on
the LVM based system (on the same spindles). That would cause double the
I/O and a lot more seeks.
How does the read performance compare.
J Potter wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Has anyone else encountered high latency for disk i/o on a PE 1850?
> What was the solution?
>
> We have a server that's been running fine for several years, and over
> the past few months, i/o throughput has gotten dramatically worse.
> I've been unable to track it down to any particular change.
>
> We're running CentOS 4.7, relatively standard config. I've compared
> bonnie++ output between this server and another 1850 running CentOS 4.
> (See "vs" column below.) omreport shows both systems as having the
> same write through settings on the raid controller. I've not been able
> to find any clues in system logs or omreport logs. Both servers are a
> raid-1 config, although the one with performance issues is running
> LVM. Both servers use ext3 as the filesystem.
>
> Sequential Output:
> Latency K/sec Per Char: 1379ms vs 41ms (33x)
> Latency K/sec Block: 3015ms vs 846ms (3x)
>
> Sequential Create:
> files /sec: 1926 vs 22816 (11x)
> Latency: 334ms vs 0.2ms (1670x)
>
> Unfortunately, the server is in production, so it's not so easy to
> isolate things. The test results will be skewed because of other
> processes running on the production instance.
>
> Thoughts? I'm stumped.
>
> -Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
> Linux-PowerEdge at dell.com
> http://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
> Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
>
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge
mailing list