PE2950 and Linux virtualization
Matthew Marlowe
matt at deploylinux.net
Thu Jun 5 20:40:04 CDT 2008
> How much of a performance hit, or gain (I'd presume hit), does
> virtualization cause an application, resulting in what percentage poorer
> or better (I'd presume poorer) performance vs dealing directly with the
> OS?
>
In the case of scientific computing, I'd be a little concerned about the
overhead of virtualization -- but honestly hardware is so cheap these
days and the benefits of virtualization so great that you can probably
get good results if you use mature implementations like VMware ESX and
you avoid cpu/memory contention in your vm deployment (e.g. focus more
on partitioning system resources rather than sharing them, divide an 8
core cpu system into 4 dual-core vm's/etc). The real hit to
virtualization performance occurs when the hypervisor has to pause one
vm temporarily to let another run. Dedicating 1-2 cpu cores per VM
should keep that to a minimum. Ditto for allocating ram/ don't over
provision.
Regards,
Matt
--
DeployLinux Consulting, Inc
Senior Infrastructure Consultant
Tel: 805-857-9144 matt at deploylinux.net
Yahoo IM: deploylinuxconsulting
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge
mailing list