Physical Disks on Controllers
Michael Blinn
mblinn at peopleplaces.org
Wed Feb 27 08:03:14 CST 2008
Hold that thought - It looks like OMSA is reporting incorrectly. In the
BIOS, the physical and virtual drives are defined correctly, with 2
disks in a virtual drive, and the remaining 5 on the second controller
in a virtual drive at RAID5.
Is this a problem that others have seen, where drives appear to be
misreported in the incorrect enclosure?
-Michael Blinn
Michael Blinn wrote:
> I recently purchased a PE2900III with the PERC6/i controller card. My
> idea was to have a split-backplane setup, with 2 mirrored drives on one
> controller for the OS, and then 5 in a RAID5 on the second controller.
>
> After installing Ubuntu and OMSA3.3.0 from sara.nl I've found that this
> is not how the disks are configured. One one controller there are 3
> disks, and on another there are 4. This means that my RAID5 array spans
> two controllers (1 on controller 0, 4 on controller 1).
>
> What are the implications of such a configuration? Speed limitations?
> Reliability? Redundancy? Is it possible to do the setup I describe
> above, or is there a 4-disk-per-controller limit?
>
> Kindest regards,
> Michael Blinn
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge
mailing list