Physical Disks on Controllers

Michael Blinn mblinn at peopleplaces.org
Wed Feb 27 08:03:14 CST 2008


Hold that thought - It looks like OMSA is reporting incorrectly. In the
BIOS, the physical and virtual drives are defined correctly, with 2
disks in a virtual drive, and the remaining 5 on the second controller
in a virtual drive at RAID5.

Is this a problem that others have seen, where drives appear to be
misreported in the incorrect enclosure?

-Michael Blinn

Michael Blinn wrote:
> I recently purchased a PE2900III with the PERC6/i  controller card. My 
> idea was to have a split-backplane setup, with 2 mirrored drives on one 
> controller for the OS, and then 5 in a RAID5 on the second controller.
>
> After installing Ubuntu and OMSA3.3.0 from sara.nl I've found that this 
> is not how the disks are configured. One one controller there are 3 
> disks, and on another there are 4. This means that my RAID5 array spans 
> two controllers (1 on controller 0, 4 on controller 1).
>
> What are the implications of such a configuration? Speed limitations? 
> Reliability? Redundancy? Is it possible to do the setup I describe 
> above, or is there a 4-disk-per-controller limit?
>
> Kindest regards,
>  Michael Blinn



More information about the Linux-PowerEdge mailing list