MD1000-PERC5/E Performance issues
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Sun Dec 28 18:42:21 CST 2008
I've read up on:
http://thias.marmotte.net/archives/2008/01/05/Dell-PERC5E-and-MD1000-performance-tweaks.html
Which seems to have helped but I really don't think I'm seeing the
performance data I should be. Take the attached sar data. I started by
doing a recursive cp of some files from the filesystem to some other
drives, then started the sar dump.
At marker 12:12:55, I started to do a cat /dev/sde > /dev/null. (/dev/sde
is the array).
Why was there such a significant jump there? Also, why does sar think the
array was 100% utilized basically the whole time even though there's such
a difference in sec reads/s?
Other issues. /dev/sde is the underlying physical device (raid5).
However, it is divided up using lvm. The copy mentioned above was from
a logical volume. While I expected some overhead and performance hit, I
didn't expect it to be so huge and sporadic. I've seen reads as low as
3MB/s during a copy.
Thoughts?
-Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: sar.txt
Url: http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/attachments/20081228/f2b35349/attachment.txt
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge
mailing list