kernel vs. Debian/Red Hat/SuSE e.t.c.?
bwilson4web at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 26 12:06:59 CDT 2007
Due to budget reasons, we went with Debian about five years ago and I have
been fairly happy. I've had one problem with a Realtek driver but it was
straight forward to find and fix the source code. My bugreport and fix was
accepted and incorporated into the kernel pool. But lately, I'm having to
help some Red Hat based folks and it hasn't been easy.
My current kernel is 2.6.20-7 and I see 2.6.21 has just been released. I'll
have 2.6.21 built and tested in probably a couple of days. But I get the
impression that Red Hat is a further back and have no idea of the other
common Linux packages.
I'm not out to start a "package war" but is it correct that Red Hat tends to
be some significant number of releases behind the current kernel development
I noticed that Red Hat network configuration is tied to
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts whereas Debian and the kernel.org uses
/etc/network for IP addresses. This suggests the kernel needs a lot of
patches to maintain compatibility and there may be a large 'patch rpm'
needed to adapt the Linus kernel to Red Hat. Did I miss something here?
I really want to help the folks but if they are tied to Red Hat and can't
move to something I can help them with, I may have to walk away from helping
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge