MegaCli segfault ?

Martin Hamant mh at accelance.fr
Wed Apr 4 03:12:58 CDT 2007


Le Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:57:57 +0200
<Harald_Jensas at dell.com> écrivait:

> Hi,

Hi !

> 
> Just guessing that the drive that it tries to get information from is
> the same model as the other drive as well?

I don't know. I think yes because the server is almost new.

But look what it looks like today :

# MegaCli -LdPdInfo -a0
                                     
Number of Virtual Disks: 1
Virtual Disk: 0
Name:
RAID Level: Primary-1, Secondary-0, RAID Level Qualifier-0
Size:139392MB
State: Degraded
Stripe Size: 64kB
Number Of Drives:2
Span Depth:1
Default Cache Policy: WriteThrough ReadAheadNone Direct
Current Cache Policy: WriteThrough ReadAheadNone Direct
Access Policy: Read/Write
Disk Cache Policy: Disk's Default
Number of Spans: 1
Span: 0 - Number of PDs: 2
PD: 0 Information
Enclosure Number: 1
Slot Number: 0
Device Id: 0
Sequence Number: 2
Media Error Count: 0
Other Error Count: 0
Predictive Failure Count: 0
Last Predictive Failure Event Seq Number: 0
Raw Size: 140014MB [0x11177328 Sectors]
Non Coerced Size: 139502MB [0x11077328 Sectors]
Coerced Size: 139392MB [0x11040000 Sectors]
Firmware state: Online
SAS Address(0): 0x50010b90001ed41e
SAS Address(1): 0x0
Inquiry Data: MAXTOR  ATLAS10K5_147SASBP00J499CKBK    A

PD: 1 Information
Enclosure Number: 0
Slot Number: 255
Device Id: 65535
Sequence Number: 0
Media Error Count: 0
Other Error Count: 0
Predictive Failure Count: 0
Last Predictive Failure Event Seq Number: 0
Raw Size: 0MB [0x0 Sectors]
Non Coerced Size: 9007199254740480MB [0xfffffffffff00000 Sectors]
Coerced Size: 0MB [0x0 Sectors]
Firmware state: Unconfigured(good)
Inquiry Data: 


No more segfault, but disk reported with a crazy size and no inquiry
data :O



> 
> I would recommend the following:

I think i will :-O

(snip)
Thanks you very much for instructions !

>PS!
>If you are rebooting the server anyway, why not just update BIOS, RAID
>FW etc. at that time and save the hassle of another reboot after
>talking to support? 

Because I would have to go in the datacenter and it takes time...
And if updating this server fix the problem, it will means I have to
do the entire platform and explain this to the customer ^^  But anyway
it's a good comment and will do takedowns if needed, thanks.

-- 
Martin



More information about the Linux-PowerEdge mailing list