list-admin :: default to 'reply-to' the list ?

[Todd Lyons]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:37:00AM -0500, Ken Snider wrote:

>Lastly - principle of minimal effort: why support the default case that, for 
>the vast majority of cases, requires a poster to delete a recipient? 
>wouldn't it make more sense to have the list default reply actually go where 
>the vast majority of posts are *intended* to go?

<sigh>  Another list.  The same argument. </sigh>

If you have the option, use a mailer that supports list-reply for your
mailing lists, and your regular Outlook or Thunderbird or Evolution for
the rest of your email.  I use mutt, which supports this.  (I've tried
to switch away from mutt.  I really have.  But all of the gui clients
just plain suck.  mutt just sucks less. <tm> )

As someone who has administered lots of mailing lists, I won't set it up
any other way.  I guess it's a religious thing.  My religion says never
set the Reply-To to the list.
- -- 
Regards...		Todd
we're off on the usual strange tangents.  next will be whether
it is ethical to walk in your neighbor's open house if they're
running ipv6:-).                                  --Randy Bush
Linux kernel 2.6.17-5mdv   3 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.04, 0.06
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFSNHSY2VBGxIDMLwRAmi3AJwJjZj7JsaGt/uMGAQmarLpmeKEJACfcJu4
SCLpmzypPfL+wPGGxkprgzM=
=F+Rp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----