2650 troubles, was Okay, this is so not cool..

Seth Mos knuffie at xs4all.nl
Fri Oct 17 02:42:00 CDT 2003

At 12:22 16-10-2003 -0400, Andrew Mann wrote:
>>>Huh? Elaborate on "2.4.xx kernels of kernel.org are not greatly tested"
>>>please, I'm interested in how you could come up with such a statement
>>here it goes.
>         Can you back these claims up with specific versions and options 
> of mainline kernels

IIRC 2.4.15 filesystem corruption on unmount.
2.4.10 which died within a day because someone decided to replace the vm 


I don't make sense, I don't pretend to either. Questions?

More information about the Linux-PowerEdge mailing list