Okay, this is so not cool..
emoenke at gwdg.de
Wed Oct 15 16:13:01 CDT 2003
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 kevin.mcmahon at nokia.com wrote:
> Clearly I'm part of a mass hallucination of people who think their
> 2650's crash all of the time. I agree it should be rock-solid. Sadly,
> it ain't. I have 6 that crash, and I seem to have my fellow travelers.
> Still, could be interesting... Cris says he is just using Raid 1 with 2
> drives. I'm using Raid 0 across 3 drives on my machines. I suspect
> most people are using 0 or 5. Is anyone getting crashes who is using
> Raid 1?
I am using raid 1 on all my 2650 (about 20 machines).
I had those aacraid failures on about 6 or 8 of them while using the
standard kernel.org kernels, and everything is running well since I turned
to use the SuSE kernels. It is several weeks now, and some of the machines
are doing heavy I/O.
We had discussed this here, and someone had analyzed the difference
between the SuSE kernels and the failure kernels.
So I really cannot understand why anyone still gets plagued by this bug.
All the standard 2650 hardware is running fully well with the SuSE
kernels. PERC 3/Di with the aacraid driver and the Broadcom ethernet
chips with the tg3 driver.
BTW: even the oldest 2.4.18 SuSE kernels did not have the tg3 bugs I have
read about here.
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke at gwdg.de, em at kki.org)
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge