Feasability of VERY large ext3 file system?
schmitt at inf.ethz.ch
Thu Dec 5 06:16:17 CST 2002
Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:19:40 +0100
> Seth Mos <knuffie at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> | I tried reiserfs once (long time ago (3.5)) and won't use it anymore.
> Too bad :-( You should give it a try again. 3.5 is _very_ old.
> | Crappy repair tools were one of the problems.
> Things have improved quite significantly and now it shouldn't be worse than other
> filesystems fsck.
> | And they had long lasting NFS
> | problems as well. (I believe this to be fixed these days).
> Again that was 3.5 issues. This has been fixed in 3.6 , quite some time ago.
> We use several 800Go reiserfs 3.6 volumes in production with more than 3 million directories and 25 Million
> files without almost any problems.
Could you elaborate on "without almost any problems"?
More information about the Linux-PowerEdge